Flora of North America species comparison

The green links below add additional plants to the comparison table. Blue links lead to other Web sites.
enable glossary links

Scilla

scilla, squill
Habit Herbs, perennial, scapose, from bulbs.
Bulbs

perennial, ovoid to globose, composed of free scales, progressively renewed annually.
Leaves

few, basal.
Inflorescences

racemose or cymose, 1–many-flowered, sometimes bracteate;

bracts none or 1, subtending each flower.
Flowers

perianth usually blue or purple, rarely white;

tepals distinct to base, each 1-veined;

stamens 6;

filaments inserted at base of perianth, distinct;

anthers dorsifixed, introrse;

pistil 1, 3-carpellate;

ovary superior, 3-locular, septal nectaries present, ovules 1–10 per locule;

style simple.
Fruits

capsular, 3-lobed, subglobose, dehiscence loculicidal.
Seeds

3–30, not winged, globose to ellipsoid, elaiosomes present.
x

= 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12.

Scilla
Distribution
from USDA
Eurasia; especially Mediterranean area and sw Asia; s Africa [Introduced in North America]
[BONAP county map]
Discussion

Species ca. 50 (1 in the flora).

A number of species of Scilla are commonly grown for their early, showy spring flowers, and present the possibility of becoming naturalized. In particular, S. bifolia Linnaeus, two-leaved squill, has been reported in Michigan (E. G. Voss 1972–1985, vol. 1) and northwestern Indiana (F. Swink and G. S. Wilhelm 1994). The summer-flowering hyacinth squill, S. hyacinthoides Linnaeus [Nectaroscilla hyacinthoides (Linnaeus) Parlatore], has been collected along roadsides near Mooringsport, Louisiana, and in Navarro County, Texas; it is readily distinguished from the spring-flowering species by its tall scapes (30–80 cm) with more than 40 flowers, and its more numerous leaves (8–10).

F. Speta (1998, 1998b) drastically split Scilla, placing the Eurasian members into 10–12 mostly small genera on the basis of molecular (M. Pfosser and F. Speta 1999) and karyological (J. Greilhuber 1982; J. Greilhuber et al. 1981; F. Speta 1979) studies, as well as morphological data. Some of these segregate genera correspond to subgenera and sections recognized in other Eurasian treatments over the past 75 years (e.g., P. Chouard 1930; J. McNeill 1980; E. V. Mordak 1984), but others represent even finer splitting.

(Discussion copyrighted by Flora of North America; reprinted with permission.)
Source FNA vol. 26, p. 320. Author: J. McNeill.
Parent taxa Liliaceae
Subordinate taxa
S. siberica
Name authority Linnaeus: Sp. Pl. 1: 308. (1753): Gen. Pl. ed. 5, 146. (1754)
Web links 
Unless otherwise noted, all data comes from the online version of the Flora of North America, who have made most of their content available via a Creative Commons license (CC BY 4.0).



Type/paste one or more Latin names into the boxes above; matching taxa will show up below the box as you type. You can use the up/down arrow keys to move through the list.

(If the plant you're looking for doesn't show up in the auto-complete list, that means it either isn't described in Flora of North America yet, or it's listed under a synonym. And please note that Flora of North America is still missing several plant families, including Apiaceae, Boraginaceae, and Polemoniaceae.)

Choose a data source: Flora of North America, OregonFlora

The species comparison tool is brought to you by:
Northwest Wildflowers